Saturday, May 21, 2016

9/11 World Momentum: Italy Supreme Court Submits Zionist 9/11 Crimes Against Humanity To International Criminal Tribunal!

9/11 World Momentum: Italy Supreme Court Submits Zionist 9/11 Crimes Against Humanity To International Criminal Tribunal!

David Long (9/11 survivor and Founder of 9/11 Justice Canada) and Isabelle Beenen (Spokeswoman for Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth) delivered powerful statements to the Ottawa Transit Commission amidst a debate regarding advertising standards.
9/11The debate itself was sparked by the Re-Think 9/11 Campaign which has been running public education ads in major cities across North America since September of this year. The events of September 11th 2001 were the catalyst for war and devastation upon humanity.  Not to mention the excuse used for our privacy and fundamental human rights to be stripped away in the name of ‘national security.’

Italy's Judge Ferdinando Imposimato
Italy’s Judge Ferdinando Imposimato
The President Of The Supreme Court Of Italy Ferdinando Imposimato may have just lite the fuse that will bring down the Rothschild’s House Of Cards aka; Banker’s New World Order By Totalitarianism!

President of Italy’s Supreme Court Sends The U.S. 9/11 Crimes ToInternational Criminal Court!

Ferdinando Imposimato
Ferdinando Imposimato
Ferdinando Imposimato has presided over many terrorism-related cases, including the kidnapping and ultimate assassination of President Aldo Moro, the attempted assassination of Pope John Paul II, other political assassinations, kidnapping cases, and several other cases against the Rothschild Mafia. He is a former Senator who has served on the Anti-Mafia Commission in three administrations. This week, Judge Imposimato stated publicly in writing, that 9/11 was just like the “strategy of tension”carried out against Italy. Specifically, the former Italian Prime Minister, Italian judges, and the former head of Italian counterintelligence admit that NATO, with the help of the Pentagon and CIA, carried out terror bombings in Italy and other European countries in the 1950s and blamed the communists, in order to rally people’s support for their governments in Europe in their fight against communism. As one participant in this formerly-secret program stated: “You had to attack civilians, people, women, children, innocent people, unknown people far removed from any political game. The reason was quite simple.scared-to-deathThey were supposed to force these people, the Italian public, to turn to the state to ask for greater security”
 (Italy and other European countries subject to the terror campaign, had just joined NATO before the bombings occurred).
This modus is undeniably the same operandi being used today by the bankers in the U.S. Within the last several months in the U.S., horrific murderous acts of “strategy of tension” have developed an alarming national dialogue of sufferage and outrage.Clinton Benghazi
Facebook on December 27th 2012 Purged 50 Scientist/Architects/Engineers of 9/11 Investigative Facebook pages. Bilderbergers met in Rome December 30, 2012. Facebook has now restored these pages without explanation.
Facebook on December 27th 2012 Purged 50 Scientist/Architects/Engineers of 9/11 Investigative Facebook pages. Bilderbergers met in Rome December 30, 2012. Facebook has now restored these pages without explanation.
Following on the heels of Judge Ferdinando  Imposimato’s Submission To The International Criminal Court And Contemporaneously With The Emergency Mafia Meeting Of The Bilderbergers…  ….Facebook on December 27th 2012, Purged 50 Scientists/Architects/Engineers of 9/11 Investigative Facebook pages from their site. Bells are ringing people!Read More Here!
italy 911

Italy’s Supreme Court Decision On 9/11

The 9/11 attacks were a global state terror operation permitted by the administration of the USA, which had foreknowledge of the operation yet remained intentionally unresponsive in order to make war against Afghanistan and Iraq.
To put it briefly, the 9/11 events were an instance of the strategy of tension enacted by political and economic powers in the USA to seek advantages for the oil and arms industries.Italy too was a victim of the “strategia della tensione” of the CIA, enacted in Italy from the time of the Portella della Ginestra massacre in Sicily in 1947 until 1993.There is much evidence of this strategy, both circumstantial and scientific.The reports of the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), November 20, 2005, set forth the following conclusions.
The airplanes that struck each of the twin towers caused a breach as well as an explosion evidenced by a giant fireball. The remaining jet fuel flowed onto the lower floors, sustaining the fires. The heat from the fires deformed the building structures and both towers collapsed completely from top to bottom. Very little that was of any size remained after these events except steel as well as aluminum fragments and the pulverized dust from the concrete floors.
World Trade Center 7 also collapsed–in a way that was inconsistent with the common experience of engineers. The final NIST report claimed that the plane strikes against the twin towers were responsible for all three building collapses: WTC1, WTC2 and WTC7. All three buildings collapsed completely, but Building 7 was not hit by a plane.
WTC7’s collapse violated common experience and was unprecedented.The NIST report does not analyze the actual nature of the collapses. According to experts at the Toronto Hearings (Sept. 8-11, 2011), the collapses had features that indicate controlled explosions.
I agree with architect Richard Gage and engineer Jon Cole, both highly experienced professionals, who have arrived at their conclusions through reliable tests, scientific proof, and the visual testimony of people above suspicion, including firefighters and victims. The authoritative theologian David Ray Griffin has described very precisely why the hypothesis of controlled demolition should be taken into consideration. Various witnesses heard bursts of explosions.
According to NIST the collapse of Building 7 was due to fires provoked by the collapse of the twin towers. Chemist and independent researcher Kevin Ryan, however, has demonstrated that NIST gave contradictory versions of the collapse of Building 7. In a preliminary report NIST declared that WTC7 was destroyed because of fires provoked by diesel fuel stored in the building, while in a second report this fuel was no longer considered the cause of the building’s collapse. 1
Additional comments on the NIST version of events have been made by David Chandler, another expert witness at Toronto Hearings. Despite NIST’s claim of three distinct phases of collapse, Chandler pointed out that many available videos show that for about two and a half seconds the acceleration of the building cannot be distinguished from freefall.
NIST has been obliged to agree with this empirical fact as pointed out by Chandler, and now understandable by everyone.Peter Dale Scott, another witness at the Hearings, demonstrated that there was a systematic CIA pattern of withholding important information from the FBI, even when the FBI would normally be entitled to it. Furthermore, there is additional evidence against George Tenet and Tom Wilshire.
According to the former White House chief of antiterrorism, Richard Clarke (interview given on French and German TV as part of a documentary by Fabrizio Calvi and Christopf Klotz, August 31, 2011 as well as the interview with Calvi and Leo Sisti, “il fatto quotidiano”, Aug. 30, 2011) the CIA was aware of the imminent attack of 9/11.
Moreover, since 1999 the CIA had investigated Khalid al-Mihdhar and Nawaf al-Hamzi, both Saudis who were associated with the American Airlines plane that hit the Pentagon. The CIA had been informed that Khalid al-Mihdhar and Nawaf al-Hamzi had arrived in the USA in early 2000.
It is legitimate to deduce that Tenet, chief of the CIA, and Wilshire, according to Peter Dale Scott a “key figure” in Alec Station blocked the efforts of two FBI agents—Doug Miller and Mark Rossini—to notify the FBI center that one of the participants in the Kuala Lumpur meeting, al-Mihdhar, got a US visa through the United States consulate in Jeddah.
Professor Scott, basing himself on Kevin Fenton’s research, mentions 35 different occasions when the hijackers were protected in this fashion, from January of 2000 to September 5, 2001. With reference to the earlier of these incidents, the motive of this protection was evidently, according to Fenton, “to cover a CIA operation that was already in progress.” 1 Further circumstantial evidence against Tenet and Wilshire is the following. On July 12, 2001 Osama bin Laden was in American Hospital in Dubai. He was visited by a CIA agent. This information was given to Le Figaro, which also reported that bin Laden had been operated on in this hospital, having arrived from Quetta, Pakistan.
This information was confirmed by Radio France International, which disclosed the name of the agent who met bin Laden—Larry Mitchell. Tenet and Wilshire, aware of the presence of bin Laden in the United Arab Emirates, failed to have him arrested and extradited, although FBI and CIA documents held him responsible for massacres in Kenya and Tanzania.
Insider trading is further strong evidence against the CIA, FBI and the US government. Articles by Professor Paul Zarembka, as well as by Kevin Ryan and others, prove such insider trading took place in the days immediately prior to the attacks. Yet this insider trading has been denied by the FBI and the 9/11 Commission.
Additional evidence against the CIA and the US administration is the following. Atta, at least since May 2000, was under CIA surveillance in Germany, according to the 9/11 Commission, both because he was accused since 1986 of attempts against Israel and because he had been surprised while purchasing great quantities of chemical products for use in explosives in Frankfurt (The Observer, Sept. 30, 2001).
He was investigated by the Egyptian Secret Service and his cellular phone tapped. On November of 1999 Mohammed Atta left Hamburg, went to Karachi, Pakistan and then to Kandahar. Here he met bin Laden and Sheikh Omar Saeed (Homeland Security Global, “Movements of Mohammed Atta”).
After June 2000 the USA continued to monitor Atta, intercepting his conversations with Sheikh Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, considered the director of 9/11, who lived in Pakistan.Strong evidence that the CIA was aware of Atta’s irregular movements from the USA to Europe and within the USA is the declassified CIA document sent by the Agency to G.W. Bush (President’s Daily Brief).
This document, dated August 6, 2001, says: “Bin Laden Determined to Strike in US.” It continues:“Clandestine, foreign government, and media reports indicate bin Laden since 1997 has wanted to conduct terrorist attacks in the United States.
Bin Laden implied in U.S. television interviews in 1997 and 1998 that his followers would follow the example of World Trade Center bomber Ramzi Yousef, and ‘bring the fighting to America.’After US missile strikes on his base in Afghanistan in 1998, bin Laden told followers he wanted to retaliate in Washington, according to a foreign intelligence service.
An Egyptian Islamic Jihad operative told an agent of a foreign intelligence service at the same time that bin Laden was planning to exploit the operative’s access to the US to mount a terrorist strike….A clandestine source said in 1998 that a bin Laden cell in New York was recruiting Muslim-American youth for attacks.
This document proves that the CIA, FBI, as well as President Bush, knew by August 6, 2001, who had operative access: Atta.
No one enjoyed such access to the US as Atta. But the CIA, FBI and Bush did nothing to stop him.I have collected in Italy evidence that the Iraq War was decided on by the U.S. government before the 9/11 attacks with the help of the Italian Secret Service.
According to Michel Chossudovsky, the 9/11 attacks were used as a pretext for war, having had as background the many years of CIA creation of, and support for, the terrorist network now known as al Qaeda.
Today there is a danger of a new “preventive war” against Iran by the USA.
This could be terrible for the people of the world and could even destroy a large part of humanity.
The only possibility for achieving justice is to submit the best evidence concerning the involvement of specific individuals in 9/11 to the Prosecutor of the International Criminal Court and ask him to investigate according to the articles 12, 13, 15 and 17, letters a and b, of the Statute of the ICC, recalling also the preamble of the Statute:
1 Recognizing that such grave crimes threaten the peace, security and the well being of the world, Affirming that the most serious crimes of concern to the international community as a whole must not go unpunished and that their effective prosecution must be ensured by taking measures at the national level and by enhancing international cooperation, Determined to put an end to impunity for the perpetrators of these crimes and thus to contribute to the prosecution of such crimes, Recalling that the duty of every state to exercise its jurisdiction over those responsible for international crimes, …

 Oh BTW,

Those Attending This Bilderberg Mafia Emergency Meeting

Are As Follows:

Reported by Dagospia, the attendees have been reported to be:
  • Enrico Letta,
  • Enrico Bondi,
  • Mario Monti,
  • Marlieke de Vogel,
  • Corradino Passera,
  • Education Minister Francesco Profumo,
  • Paola Severino,
  • Elsa Fornero,
  • Guiliano Amato,
  • Governor of the European Central Bank Mario Draghi,
  • Lilli Gruber,
  • Chicco Mentana, “Bebe Bernabe”,
  • Flebuccio de Bortoli,
  • Vendeline von Bredow,
  • Mauro Moretti of CGIL,
  • Alberto Nagel the CEO of Mediobanca,
  • Angelo Gimbals the Chairman of Agcom,
  • Federico Ghizzoni of Unicredito,
  • Enrico Teaspoons of Intesa,
  • Fulvio Conti of Enel,
  • Anna Marion Tarantola who is the President of Rai,
  • Rodolfo De Benedetti the President of the CIR,
  • Ignazio Vis the Governor of the Bank of Italy.
clinton benghazi

How Big Banks have literally “blown up” our Western financial system by their extreme & reckless fraud

Iraq Being Suicided By Rothschild’s IMF & J.P. Morgan

Fractional Digital Reserve Banking Fraud.
Fractional Digital Reserve Banking Fraud. 100+90+81=
What is euphemistically called “fractional-reserve banking” is obvious fraud, and obvious crime. By its very definition; it transforms the banking sector of an economy into a leveraged Ponzi-scheme, and as with all Ponzi-schemes, there is no possible “happy ending” here.
Mathematically-based principles are often illustrated best through use of an extreme, numerical example. We have no need to construct any hypothetical extremes, however, when we already have real-life insanity, in our current monetary/regulatory framework.
Central Bank of Iraq finalises agreement with Zaha Hadid Architects to design new office headquarters in central Baghdad The Central Bank of Iraq on February 2 signed an agreement to begin the process of building new headquarters on the shores of the Tigris River in Baghdad. "The new building shall be a symbol of the [central] bank's role in the economic development of Iraq and a reflection of the determination to rebuild the country,"
Central Bank of Iraq finalises agreement with Zaha Hadid Architects to design new office headquarters in central Baghdad The Central Bank of Iraq on February 2 signed an agreement to begin the process of building new headquarters on the shores of the Tigris River in Baghdad. “The new building shall be a symbol of the [central] bank’s role in the economic development of Iraq and a reflection of the determination to rebuild the country.” The £630 million building will be built on a 20 hectare site in West Baghdad, which wasoriginally used by Saddam Hussein to partially construct a super mosque.

J.P. Morgan was ‘granted’ the rights to, effectively, set up the Central Bank of Iraq in Dec. 2003:

  1. J.P. Morgan Chase was chosen by the Coalition Provisional Authority [CPA] to ‘set up’ the NEW Central Bank of Iraq [specifically, the Trade Bank of Iraq ].
  2. Take note how this TRADE BANK only became operational in December of 2003:
  3. Trade Finance. The Trade Bank of Iraq (TBI) was established in July 2003 to facilitate trade of goods and services to and from Iraq by providing irrevocable letters of credit.
  4. The TBI officially became fully operational in December 2003 and has a services contract with a multi-international banking consortium led by JP Morgan Chase.
  5. Since opening in December, the Trade Bank of Iraq has issued or has pending 183 letters of credit, totaling $708.9 million in imports from thirty-one countries.
  6. Letters of credit have been issued on behalf of Iraqi Ministries as well as several state-owned enterprises.
  7. In that capacity, Morgan was charged with developing the framework of collateralizing movable and immovable property for the nation of Iraq.
  8. The fact is that one of the largest derivatives facilitators [aka paper promissory notes aka fractional digital banking scheme] in the world is one of the principal architects of the Trade Bank of Iraq,
  9. plus it is also well-known that J.P. Morgan has a direct connection to the Rothschild banking dynasty ~~ a trend that is to be seen in virtually every central and major bank in existence across the planet.
Massive media campaign to minimize IQD ownership. This is done by deception of facts.
Iraq’s IQD 2016: Presently not released from “tight monetary controls” Iraq is under siege by the Cabal’s IMF preventing International Exchange.
Here it is important to note that in order to conceal the fraud, crime, and insanity of our present system to the greatest degree possible, the bankers hide their dirty deeds within their own convoluted jargon. Thus presenting “fractional-reserve banking” to readers requires some brief investment of time in definition of terms, starting with this term, itself.
Fractional-reserve banking evolved literally based upon the temptation of all bankers to perpetrate fraud. Empirically it has always been observed, down through the centuries, that under normal circumstances, only a tiny percentage of depositors will come to claim their cash/wealth at any one time.
Thus the temptation is for bankers to “lend” more funds than they actually possess, i.e. they are “lending” what does not even exist: “fractional-reserve banking” – the ultimate euphemism of banking and fraud.
To bring into debt; to place under obligation; — chiefly
used in the participle indebted.
[1913 Webster]
lans are still underway to build a vast new $1-billion parliamentary complex in Baghdad. The well-known London-based, Iraqi-born architect Zaha Hadid has been tapped to design a 2.7-million-square-foot building on the 49-acre site
Iraq’s New Parliamentary Building ~~ She goes up ~ a vast new $1-billion parliamentary complex in Baghdad. The well-known London-based, Iraqi-born architect Zaha Hadid has been tapped to design a 2.7-million-square-foot building on the 49-acre site.
Up until the false flag attacks by Israel, and Israel Firsters in the US government, on the WTC in New York on 9-11-2001, there were 7 countries left in the world who had not buckled to pressure, who had not resigned themselves to slavery under the Rothschild fractional reserve banking system. Those countries were Afghanistan, Cuba, Iran, Iraq, Libya, North Korea and Sudan. But Now There Are More!
It goes without saying that anyone or any entity which endeavours to “lend” something which does not exist is perpetrating fraud.
Iraq ChamChamal Prison $29 Million. Wasting No Time It Was Completed IN 2009.
Iraq ChamChamal Prison $29 Million. Wasting No Time ~ It Was Completed In 2009.
A prolonged period of little or no growth in the economy. Economic growth of less than 2 to 3% annually is considered stagnation. Periods of stagnation are also marked by high unemployment and involuntary part-time employment. Stagnation can also occur on a smaller scale in specific industries or companies or with wages.
In late 2012, supporters said the Federal Reserve’s third round of quantitative easing [printing currency either digitally or physically] was necessary to help the United States avoid economic stagnation.
The central bank’s proposed asset purchases of mortgage-backed debt were expected to foster economic growth, bolster the housing market and improve employment prospects.
The Fed also kept interest rates low as part of its plan to prevent stagnation.
But before examining this inherent fraud more closely, it is important to back-up, and look at the Law. Note that even when banks “lend” the money which they actually do hold on deposit (as trustees for the depositors) that this is already wholly/totally illegal.
Gates Rothschild NWO
Gates Rothschild NWO

divider gif

It is the crime known as “conversion”.

divider gif
France ~ David de Rothschild
France ~ David de Rothschild

Criminal conversion:

A person who knowingly or intentionally exerts unauthorized control over property of another person commits criminal conversion.
When your bank lends-out money you deposited, which it claims to be “holding” for you as trustee, does it seek your prior authorization before lending-out your property and thus putting it at risk? Of course not. The banks get around the naked criminality of their lending operations through general authorization.
In the small-print of any/all bank deposit contracts is a clause whereby the depositor “authorizes” the bank to lend-out their property to Third Parties.
We therefore start with the basic fact, that “banking” as we know it (bankers taking deposits, and then lending those deposits) is literally institutionalized crime.
But “fractional-reserve banking” goes far beyond this original level of criminality.
Not only are banks allowed to lend what they don’t own, they are allowed to lend what they don’t even possess – and by many multiples.
“Banking” is institutionalized crime. “Fractional-reserve banking” piles-on a systemic and enormous element of fraud: “lending” what does not even exist. But this isn’t even the most-shocking aspect of fractional-reserve fraud.
Rothschild Billionaire Mahafarid Amir Khosravi, executed In Iran For bilking money then buying Iranian property for Agenda 21
Rothschild Billionaire Mahafarid Amir Khosravi, executed In Iran For bilking money then buying Iranian property for Agenda 21
Here readers need to understand the consequence of allowing banks to lend what they do not even possess. A simple, hypothetical example will illustrate the principal-of-insanity which is the basis of our current monetary system .
Suppose JPMorgan holds $1 billion in total deposits. In the original form of our fractional-reserve fraud, the fraud ratio was set at 10:1. This meant that for every dollar which a bank actually held, it was allowed to “lend” $10. Now the simple arithmetic.
JPMorgan is holding $1 billion of other peoples’ property, but it is allowed to “lend” a total of $10 billion. Where does the other $9 billion come from? It is literally conjured out of thin air , via fractional-reserve fraud.
Thus, for many readers, this represents their first, actual glimpse of the full fraud, and full insanity of our current monetary system.
In the original form of our “fractional-reserve” monetary system, for every $1 which our central banks officially printed, the banking system created an additional $9 out of thin air, via fractional-reserve fraud. Simply put; 90% of all the actual “money” in our monetary system, and our economies, was conjured out of thin air , by private banks, via fractional-reserve fraud.
This is fractional-reserve banking, presented as the naked fraud that it is: bankers “lending” not only more than what they possess, but lending out “money” which grossly exceeds the amount of capital in existence. Conjuring oceans of paper out of thin air. It is inherently criminal. It is inherently fraudulent.
dollar gold
It automatically transforms our monetary system into an institutionalized Ponzi-scheme.
By definition, all “fractional-reserve banking systems” must automatically collapse – in a sea of fraud – if all depositors simply claim a tiny portion of their deposits, at any one time.
This is also known euphemistically as a “run on a bank”.
Here, however, the euphemism is intended to insinuate that the mere act of depositors taking possession of their own property is somehow a “crime” against that financial system. Indeed, directly implying as much, our own governments will institute “bank holidays”.
This is yet another banking euphemism where depositors are legally prohibited from taking possession of their own property. The most recent example of such financial oppression was in Greece .
How can governments justify such financial oppression? While it is never explicitly acknowledged, the justification is entirely singular: to prop-up a Ponzi-scheme. It thus becomes necessary for governments to abandon the Rule of Law, and legally prevent/prohibit their own citizens from taking possession of their own property – as the only means of preventing the complete implosion of that system. The epitome of a Ponzi-scheme.
Observe how totally perverted and totally criminalized is the current system of fractional-reserve fraud. The banks are legally allowed to commit the crime of conversion: “lending” what they do not own.
The banks are legally allowed to commit fraud: “lending” what does not even exist. But if/when Depositors seek to take possession of their own property; they are treated like criminals.
The bankers are granted absolute legal protection to perpetrate their fraud/crime, at the direct expense of the law-abiding citizens of that society.
Iceland constitution
  1. Iceland Sends 26 Corrupt Bankers To Prison.
  2. Iceland Follows President Jefferson’s Warning About Debt Load.
  3. Every Icelander To Get Paid In Bank Sale: 26 Bankers Behind Bars!
However, this marks only the starting-point for our present system of monetary/financial fraud. In its original form; fractional-reserve fraud was already entirely criminalized, and already entirely fraudulent. How/why would our governments have ever turned our entire financial system into such institutionalized fraud?
They were convinced to do so on the basis of the promise/guarantee of the bankers. The bankers promised that they would exercise the enormous, legal privilege which they had been granted by acting in a responsible manner, and doing nothing to jeopardize this institutionalized Ponzi-scheme.
In reality; the banks have done the precisely the opposite. First the Big Bank crime syndicate had their servants in our puppet-governments tear-up the legal distinction between “banking” (institutionalized fraud) and “investing” ( institutionalized gambling ).
Overnight, our banks were transformed into bank-casinos.
Clinton's 1999 Green Light For Banks To Make High Risk Investments Against The Middle Class!
Clinton’s 1999 Green Light For Banks To Make High Risk Investments Against The Middle Class!
Not only were these “banks” lending-out funds which grossly exceeded their current assets, they were gambling with these funds, and at even greater ratios of leveraged fraud. The result of combining extreme fraud with extreme financial recklessness was the Crash of ’08.
The Big Banks literally “blew up” the Western financial system with their extreme, reckless gambling – gambling which began with the deposits which they claimed to be holding as trustees.
Instead of our governments punishing these Big Banks for their extreme, reckless fraud, they rewarded them. Using our money; these Traitor Governments indemnified the Big Banks for every cent of their reckless, fraudulent gambling. Then they did something much, much worse.
Our Traitor Governments bowed to the will of their banker Overlords, and dubbed these institutions of fraud/crime as being “too big to fail”. Translation? Instead of preventing these institutions of financial crime from continuing their reckless gambling, they promised to pay-off all of the banksters’ gambling debts, forever.
What happens when you tell any Compulsive Gambler that you will make-good on all of their gambling losses?
The Gambler runs wild. Observe what the banking crime syndicate calls “the derivatives market”.
Majority Sunni Minority Shiite
Majority Sunni Minority Shiite
It is their own private, rigged casino, where the total amount of ultra-leveraged betting is twenty times as large as the entire global economy .
Thus to go with the institutionalized crime and the institutionalized fraud of “fractional-reserve banking”, our Traitor Governments then added institutionalized extortion: allowing the Big Bank crime syndicate to blackmail our governments, in perpetuity, with the threat “bail-out all of our bad debts, or else…”
Following the Crash of ’08, and the literal sell-out by our own governments to the Big Bank crime syndicate; all of these Traitor Governments made the same promise to us: “never again.”
Supposedly, they would never again allow the Big Banks to blow-up our financial system, and to keep this promise, they all pledged “tough, new laws” – to restrain the reckless gambling of the Big Bank crime syndicate.
What these Traitor Governments actually did was the exact opposite of everything they promised. Instead of reducing and restraining the insane, reckless gambling of the bankers which led to the Crash of ’08, they institutionalized that, as well.
This will be the subject of Part II: taking a system which was already wholly criminal, ridiculously fraudulent, and completely unstable, and making it much, much worse.
rolling stone

clock gif
Related Articles: